Review identity first. Compare face shape, hairline, hair volume, body proportions, skin tone, scars, marks, and asymmetrical features across all requested views. Review costume second. Trace every visible strap, seam, closure, pocket, sleeve, hem, and shoe shape. Review props third. Confirm count, scale, carrying side, attachment, and orientation. Review palette fourth. Check that dominant and accent roles do not swap between figures. Only then assess rendering polish, layout balance, or decorative callouts.
Look closely at hands, feet, ears, glasses, straps, and thin props because these details often reveal generation errors. Check whether a back view has become a mirrored front, whether a profile quietly changes the jacket length, whether a bag strap passes through the neck, or whether an emblem becomes unreadable pseudo-text. Mark problems by category. A structural identity error usually deserves a brief revision and a new generation. A tiny buckle mismatch may be easier to correct manually after the overall design is approved.
Do not average incompatible views into an imaginary final design. Choose the approved answer for each disputed feature and put that answer back into the written specification. This creates a stronger source of truth than the image alone. For teams, record the date, version, intended medium, approved anchors, unresolved questions, and any manually corrected details. A beautiful board without approval notes can increase ambiguity because different collaborators may select different figures as the authoritative version.